[NLA] Cross-post from NIFL-Assessment on alternative assessments

[Gloria Gillette]

    In addition to Equipped For the Future (EFF), what states, initiatives
     or organizations are developing valid and reliable assessments that fit
     adult learners' goals? Is any state actually using such assessments now?
 
Ohio is. We have a uniform portfolio system that is being used statewide and is in the process of being validated through the Ohio State University.
Gloria Gillette

----- Original Message ----- 
From: David J. Rosen <djrosen at massed.net>
To: <nla at lists.literacytent.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: [NLA] Cross-post from NIFL-Assessment on alternative assessments


> NLA Colleagues,
> 
> The NIFL-Assessment post below, a reply to the post below it, raises an
> important policy point (one made before on this list by Massachusetts
> State ABE Director, Bob Bickerton,) that current federal policy allows
> the use of assessments which are not standardized tests if they can be
> shown to be valid and reliable. Few states, however, are taking
> advantage of that opportunity.  And even if states are developing
> alternatives, driven by accountability for numbers, limited in knowledge
> about these assessments, and lacking time to use them, practitioners may
> fall back on the often easier-to-use standardized tests -- even if they
> know these are not valid, e.g. not related to their students' goals.
> 
> Does this matter?
> 
> Yes. If programs are held accountable to results from standardized tests
> which do not fit with what adult learners and programs are trying to
> accomplish, then the most important learner gains or outcomes may not be
> measured, and successful programs will not shine.  Eventually, if
> funding decisions are based on standardized test results which do not
> fit curricula designed to meet learner or program goals, programs will
> tailor their curricula to the tests, making adult education and literacy
> less relevant to students.  It would be unfortunate and ironic that in
> the name of increasing standards and accountability -- because we lack a
> good set of valid and reliable assessment options for our field --
> programs may teach to these tests and, in doing so, may lower their standards.
> 
> In addition to Equipped For the Future (EFF), what states, initiatives
> or organizations are developing valid and reliable assessments that fit
> adult learners' goals? Is any state actually using such assessments now?
> 
> David J. Rosen
> <djrosen at massed.net>
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:29] Re: question
> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Don Seaman <dseaman at tamu.edu>
> Reply-To: nifl-assessment at nifl.gov
> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment at literacy.nifl.gov>
> 
> The reason that thinking is prevalent is that we are playing numbers
> games 
> for reporting and funding.  Our staff members, at a training session, 
> presented "It is allowed" which identifies and promotes alternative 
> assessment procedures. It was received quite well, but many folks in the 
> audience indicated that they would be evaluated by the numbers they
> produce 
> so they probably weren't going to change using tests as their main, if
> not 
> only method of assessment.
> 
> Don Seaman
> Texas Center for Adult Literacy and Learning
> EAHRD-College of Education
> 4226 TAMU
> College Station, TX 77843-4226
> Telephone: 979-845-5472
> FAX: 979-845-0952
> 
> At 06:42 PM 10/26/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >I have just come back from a meeting where assessment for ABLE students was
> >discussed in one of the sessions. An observation made by the
> facilitator of
> >this session (I was facilitating a different session so I couldn't attend)
> >was that the teachers in the discussion group think of assessment as the
> >usual standardized tests (TABE, BEST, etc). Only two of the teachers at this
> >session mentioned alternative assessments. Have others found this to be true
> >in the ABLE teachers you are in contact with? What sugggestions do you have
> >for changing the thinking of folks?
> >Thanks,
> >  Dianna Baycich
> >OLRC
> >330-672-7841
> >1-800-765-2897 x27841
> >dbaycich at literacy.kent.edu
> >Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies
> >to trying to prove the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly
> >succeed and are right.
> >H.L. Mencken
> _______________________________________________
> NLA mailing list: NLA at lists.literacytent.org
> http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/nla
> LiteracyTent: web hosting, news, community and goodies for literacy
> http://literacytent.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/nla/attachments/20011031/4c5e3b72/attachment.htm