NLA Info: Comments Invited on ESEA Reauthorization

Alice Johnson ajohnson at nifl.gov
Mon Jun 15 10:30:40 EDT 1998


     The following invitation was issued by the Department of Education.
     
     Alice Johnson
     National Institute for Literacy


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Comments Invited on ESEA Reauthorization
Author:  edinfo at inet.ed.gov at inet
Date:    6/12/98 11:09 AM


     
     YOU ARE INVITED by the Secretary of Education to submit 
     written comments regarding the reauthorization of programs 
     under the Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA)*, the 
     Goals 2000: Educate America Act, & Subtitle B of Title VII of 
     the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (Education for 
     Homeless Children & Youth).
     
          *Note:  ESEA is the cornerstone of federal aid to 
          elementary & secondary schools.  Under the programs 
          authorized by ESEA, about $12 billion annually is 
          invested in assisting states, districts, & schools as 
          they seek to improve teaching & learning to help all 
          children, especially at-risk children, meet challenging 
          state standards.  The Secretary intends to submit the 
          Department's reauthorization proposal for ESEA, Goals 
          2000, & related programs to Congress early in 1999. 
          (Authorization for most of these programs expires 
          September 30, 1999.)
     
     This invitation was issued by the Secretary in a June 2, 1998, 
     Federal Register notice.  Excerpts from that notice are below; 
     however, individuals planning to comment are encouraged to 
     read the *entire* notice, available at:
     
          http://ocfo.ed.gov/gophroot/4fedreg/5other/060298a.txt
     
     The Secretary is interested both in comments regarding changes 
     that may be needed, as well as comments on aspects of the 
     programs that are working well & should be maintained. 
     Comments must be received by the Department on or before July 
     17, 1998.  Comments may also be submitted at regional meetings 
     to be held July 8-15, 1998.  (See dates, times & locations of 
     regional meetings below.)
     
     Written comments should be addressed to Judith Johnson, Deputy 
     Assistant Secretary, Office of Elementary & Secondary 
     Education, U. S. Department of Education, 600 Independence 
     Avenue, SW. (Portals Building, Room 4000), Washington, DC 
     20202-6132.  E-mail responses may be sent to: 
     Frances_Shadburn at ed.gov.
     
     For more information, please contact Frances Shadburn, U.S. 
     Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, SW. (Portals 
     Building, Room 4000) Washington, DC 20202-6100.  Telephone: 
     (202) 401-0113.  Individuals who use a telecommunications 
     device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information 
     Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. & 8 
     p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.  Individuals with 
     disabilities may obtain this document in an alternate format 
     (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) 
     on request.
     
======================================================== 
EXCERPTS from Notice of Request for Public Comment, 
Reauthorization of Elementary & Secondary Education 
Programs, (Federal Register: June 2, 1998, [page 30055]) 
========================================================
     
The questions in this [Federal Register] notice are organized under 
three cross-cutting categories.  These categories are: (1) Federal 
support for State & local school reform including questions 
addressing implementing standards in the classroom through 
professional development, technology to support teaching & 
learning, & targeting resources; (2) strategies for addressing the 
needs of children most at risk of failing to meet State standards; 
& (3) school environments conducive for learning including 
questions addressing Safe & Drug-Free Schools & Communities, 
parental involvement, extended learning opportunities before & 
after school, & school facilities.  In addition to consideration of 
the cross-cutting issues, individual programs will also be reviewed 
as part of the reauthorization.  Comments on issues other than 
those raised in this notice are welcome.
     
Issues for Public Comment
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
SUPPORT FOR STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL REFORM: GENERAL QUESTIONS
     
    1.  Are there changes in Federal statutes that would make Goals
2000, ESEA, & related programs more effective tools for supporting 
comprehensive State & school district school reform?  For example, 
given the progress that States, districts, & schools have made in 
implementing standards-based reforms, are changes needed to Goals 
2000 to make it better aligned with current implementation efforts? 
Are there changes that would enable Goals 2000, ESEA, & related 
programs to support more effectively State & school district 
efforts to improve the capacity of teachers, schools, & districts 
to integrate standards into the classroom?  Are there changes that 
would make it easier for States, districts, schools, & teachers to 
get information on new research, on research-based programs, & on 
promising practices for improving the achievement of all students, 
especially educationally disadvantaged children?
    2.  In addition to funding technical assistance through a
variety of ESEA & Goals 2000 authorities, the U.S. Department of 
Education also funds regional educational laboratories to assist in 
the implementation of education reform.  Are there changes to the 
Federal statutes that would enable federally supported technical 
assistance efforts to support State & district, & school reform 
more effectively?
    3.  Are there changes to the Federal statutes that would
encourage greater public school choice as part of State & local 
school reform?  For example, the Department of Education encourages 
expansion of choice within the public school system with such 
alternatives as charter schools, magnet schools, & system-wide 
strategies that make every public school a school of choice.  Are 
changes needed in the law to strengthen these alternatives?  Are 
changes needed in the Federal law to incorporate the knowledge 
gained about school reform from the establishment & operation of 
charter & magnet schools?
    4.  The ESEA currently contains provisions addressing the
participation of private school students & teachers that are 
applicable across many ESEA programs.  Are there changes to Federal 
statutes that would improve the effectiveness of these provisions?
     
SUPPORT FOR STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL REFORM: IMPLEMENTING STANDARDS IN 
THE CLASSROOM
     
    5.  Are there changes to Federal statutes that would focus &
coordinate professional development resources across Goals 2000 & 
ESEA programs to ensure that all teachers & educational personnel 
have sufficient knowledge & skills to teach all children, including 
children most at risk of failing, to challenging State standards?
    6.  A recent National Academy of Sciences study states that if
all students are to become successful readers, children must be 
able to discover the nature of the alphabetic system, understand 
how sounds are represented alphabetically, gain meaning from print, 
& practice reading skills to achieve fluency.  In order to gain 
these skills, exposure to language & literacy must begin in the 
pre-school years, primary grades must focus on reading instruction; 
teachers must participate in ongoing sustained professional 
development; elementary schools must have enriched reading 
programs; students who do not have proficiency in English should be 
exposed to reading in their native language while acquiring 
proficiency in spoken English; & early intervention is critical. 
How can the use of research-based knowledge & of research-based 
approaches to improving student achievement be encouraged through 
teacher preparation & ongoing training?
    7.  Are there changes to Federal statutes that would strengthen
connections between institutions of higher education & schools for 
high-quality professional development to increase the capacity of 
teachers & principals to implement standards-based reform?
     
SUPPORT FOR STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL REFORM: USING TECHNOLOGY TO 
SUPPORT TEACHING & LEARNING
     
    8.  Are there changes to the Federal statutes that would better
support the use of technology to advance State & local school 
reform efforts designed to help all children acquire the knowledge 
contained in State content standards?  For example, are there 
changes that would improve access for students in high-poverty 
schools to high-quality academic content through technology?  Are 
there changes that would increase the ability of teachers to use 
technology as an instructional resource?  Should the focus be on 
development & demonstration of high-quality instructional 
applications of technology for all schools, or should it continue 
to be development of the infrastructure for students & schools in 
high-poverty areas?
     
SUPPORT FOR STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL REFORM: TARGETING RESOURCES/ 
EQUALIZATION
     
    9.  Are there changes to the Federal statutes that would
improve the distribution of ESEA & related program funds to 
communities & schools where they are most needed?
    10.  Current distribution formulas for some ESEA programs may
result in allocations so small that school districts may have 
difficulty mounting effective, comprehensive programs.  Are changes 
in Federal statutes needed to address this situation?
    11.  Should the Federal Government play a role in promoting
greater equity in the distribution of school funding across & 
within States.  If so, what should that role be & are there changes 
to Federal statutes that would be necessary to carry out the role?
     
STRATEGIES FOR ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF CHILDREN MOST AT RISK OF 
FAILING TO MEET STATE STANDARDS
     
    12.  Are there changes to Federal statutes that would make
Goals 2000, ESEA, & related programs more effective tools for use 
by States, districts, & schools in closing the achievement gap 
between students most at risk of failing to meet challenging State 
standards & other students?  Are there changes to the Federal 
statute that would improve the role of accountability measures in 
both raising student achievement & providing more State & local 
flexibility?  For example, should Title I improvement provisions be 
changed or strengthened?
    13.  Students most at risk of failing to meet State standards
need the highest quality instruction provided by the most 
knowledgeable teachers, yet half of the instructional staff in 
Title I are paraprofessionals, most of whom have only high school 
diplomas.  Are there changes to Federal statute that would 
strengthen qualifications for Title I & Title VII (Bilingual 
Education) staff who instruct students most at-risk of failing to 
meet challenging State standards?
    14.  A growing body of research on the development of the brain
& its implications for learning during certain critical periods of 
child development supports the need for early intervention & the 
importance of pre-school & parent education.  How can Federal 
programs encourage greater application of this knowledge?
     
SCHOOL ENVIRONMENTS CONDUCIVE TO LEARNING
     
    15.  Are there changes to the Safe & Drug-Free Schools &
Communities Act that would encourage the implementation of more 
effective, research-based drug & violence prevention programs?
    16.  Are there changes to Federal statutes that would
strengthen the ability of Federal education programs to assist 
families in their efforts to be active partners in their children's 
education?  For example, could the current Title I requirement for 
school-parent compacts (which describes the shared responsibility 
of schools, parents, & students for improved student achievement) 
be improved?
    17.  In addition to helping local communities finance the
construction & renovation of school facilities, what additional 
barriers to the modernization of schools need to be addressed?
     
Dates, Times, & Locations of Regional Meetings 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
    1.  July 8, 1998, 1:30-5:30 p.m., Hotel Inter-Continental Los
Angeles, 251 South Olive Street, Los Angeles, California; 
1-213-617-3300 & ask for reservations.  Room reservations must be 
made by June 17.
    2.  July 10, 1998, 1:30-5:30 p.m., Radisson Hotel & Suites, 160
East Huron Street, Chicago, Illinois, 1-312-787-2900, & ask for 
reservations.  Room reservations must be made by June 19.
    3.  July 13, 1998, 1:30-5:30 p.m., Park Plaza Hotel, 64
Arlington Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 1-617-426-2000, & ask for 
reservations.  Room reservations must be made by June 22.
    4.  July 15, 1998, 1:30-5:30 p.m., Terrace Garden Hotel, 3405
Lenox Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia, 1-404-261-9250, & ask for 
reservations.  Room reservations must be made by June 24.
     
     ============================================================== 
     To subscribe to (or unsubscribe from) EDInfo, address an email 
     message to:  listproc at inet.ed.gov  Then write either SUBSCRIBE 
     EDINFO YOURFIRSTNAME YOURLASTNAME in the message, or write 
     UNSUBSCRIBE EDINFO (if you have a signature block, please turn 
     it off).  Then send it!
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
     Past EDInfo messages: http://www.ed.gov/MailingLists/EDInfo/ 
     Search: http://www.ed.gov/MailingLists/EDInfo/search.html 
     Past ED Initiatives: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/EDInitiatives/ 
     ========================================================== 
           James Guitard, Peter Kickbush & Kirk Winters 
           U.S. Department of Education
           kirk_winters at ed.gov




More information about the Nla-nifl-archive mailing list