[AAACE-NLA] Literacy across generations

Fri Aug 20 19:08:11 EDT 2010

That is why I believe Tom Sticht has made such a strong case for intervening 
first and foremost among parents-to-be so they can help their children become 
educable (even if I don't like that term).  I don't believe that a mother's lack 
of formal education has a causal effect, only that there is a high level 
of correlation between a mother's skills and that of the child's, a 
correlation which is grounded in the cyclical nature of illiteracy.

Michael

Michael A. Gyori
Maui International Language School
www.mauilanguage.com

________________________________
From: Andres Muro <andresmuro at aol.com>
To: aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org; dwyoho at gmail.com; dwyoho at earthlink.net
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 3:26:17 AM
Subject: Re: [AAACE-NLA] Shall we resort to litigation?

Debbie, Michael, el al:

In addition to what you say about serving older adults, and those who will not 
necessarily go into employment, it is important to remember that connection 
between educational achievement of the mother and that of the child. We know 
that the best predictor of the achievement of the child is the education of the 
mother. But this does not appear to be a concern of the WIA and NRS, since the 
NCLB act was supposed to take care of the children. Unfortunately, while there 
is no evidence to show positive outcomes of NCLB, there is strong correlation 
between mother and child's education in addition to all the anecdotal evidence 
from teachers who serve adults. So, while many of those who attend ABE programs 
are mothers with very limited academic background, their fate and that of their 
children is being completely ignored by those advocating for standardized 
measures of progress.

Andres

Andres Muro
Please visit my updated art:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/25224248@N05/sets/72157611453345957/show/

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gyori <michael_gyori at yahoo.com>
To: National Literacy Advocacy List sponsored by AAACE 
<aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org>
Sent: Wed, Aug 18, 2010 2:59 pm
Subject: Re: [AAACE-NLA] Shall we resort to litigation?

Debbie,

Your words have truly touched my heart. Unfortunately, public education is 
totally in the full grip of a corporate paradigm as you have so emotionally 
stated. I can no longer listen to the tweaks that are made every year that 
ensure the safety of some bureaucrats' jobs.  As much as I appreciate the time a 
few  take to apprise us of what is goes on, it's all about rubbing even more 
salt on a big wound, Art's rendering of affairs in NH notwithstanding.

So...being sad won't solve anything until action is taken.  We might begin by 
conceptualizing a case among ourselves against what is going on at the USDOE.  I 
really did believe that matters would improve under Obama - so maybe we should 
think about sending him a petition signed by thousand upon thousands of people 
in our communities.

Michael

Michael A. Gyori
Maui International Language School
www.mauilanguage.com

------------------------------------------------------------
From: Debbie Yoho <dwyoho at gmail.com>
To: aaace-nla <aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org>; PROLITERACY LIST 
<proliteracyconnect at proliteracylist.org>
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 9:47:50 AM
Subject: [AAACE-NLA] Shall we resort to litigation?

It does not appear to me that there are any changes in the wind regarding the 
NRS that will help programs serving the hardest-to-serve or lowest-level 
learners.  In fact, it appears that the changes under discussion will actually 
make the process more cumbersome, adding specific requirements regarding learner 
goals. It appears the goal of improving academics would no longer be considered 
valid unless tied to an employment goal. 

In tracking some of the activity related to WIA reauthorization, I see a similar 
drive to refine adult education and literacy programs into a feeder system for 
employment.  I have no problem with this provided that educational services are 
available for adults who are not and will not be in the workforce.  I am 
speaking of older adults who have retired, who may even be in a nursing home, 
adults who are on disability, perhaps recovering from mental illness or 
addiction and not ready to work;  adults who have prohibitive medical problems 
such as cancer, adults who are at home full-time with young children, adults who 
are chronically homeless or incarcerated for the long-term, adults whose 
beginning skill level combined with learning disabilities means it will be years 
before they can fill out a job application, etc.

I am afraid many are getting tired of this litany begging to maintain programs 
that sensitively and effectively serve adults who do not contribute to the tax 
base through employment. The world has turned, and I find that it all falls more 
and more on deaf ears.  I knew in 1998, when the WIA highjacked adult 
education and combined an academic mission with job training, that a day would 
come when a sizeable segment of the adult population would be left behind in the 
dust with no one to care whether they have a good quality of life or not. All 
this time I have continued to remind anyone who will listen that workforce 
development is critical, but so are opportunities for ALL adults. The WIA and 
the NRS are NOT designed to serve ALL adults, but only to serve the economy.  

Where is the conscience, and the voice, of educators, policy-makers, researchers 
and academics who continue to ride the wave of globalization to contribute to 
the nation's adjustment to changing times, but also strive for simple principles 
such as justice and equity? I hear that voice here from time to time, but it is 
absent from OVAE newsletters, WIA reauthorization proposals, NRS revision 
discussions, efforts to form "career pathways", meetings of state directors, and 
media news and analysis.

So now I seriously ask:  Is the only avenue left for these adults litigation? It 
seems to me if current trends continue, someone somewhere may be able to make a 
case for discrimination.  If public funds are to be spent on education for any 
particular category of adults (such as job-seekers), funds should be available 
for any adult who wants to learn. As a former special education teacher, I know 
parents had to resort to the courts to obtain services for special-needs kids.  
It appears to me the handwriting is on the wall again.  According to Dreams from 
My Father, the president reached the conclusion that real change sometimes comes 
about only when the courts force it, so he enrolled in law school.

Debbie Yoho
Executive Director
Turning Pages Adult Literacy
www.literacycolumbia.org

_______________________________________________AAACE-NLA mailing list: 
AAACE-NLA at lists.literacytent.orghttp://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/lis
tinfo/aaace-nlaLiteracyTent: web hosting, news, community and goodies for 
literacyhttp://literacytent.org
_______________________________________________
AAACE-NLA mailing list: AAACE-NLA at lists.literacytent.org
http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/aaace-nla
LiteracyTent: web hosting, news, community and goodies for literacy
http://literacytent.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/aaace-nla/attachments/20100820/77215f33/attachment.html>