[AAACE-NLA] Leave No Cartoon Behind
Dmartin336@aol.com
Dmartin336 at aol.com
Sun Jan 30 08:47:39 EST 2005
_Leave No Cartoon Behind_
(http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=nljho8aab.ixzfm9n6.aguao8aab.tiniiyn6.58610&p=http://www.tompaine.com/articles/leave_no_cartoon_behind.ph
p)
Sunday, January 30, 2005
TomPaine.com
Leave No Cartoon Behind
Earl Hadley
January 28, 2005
(http://www.tompaine.com/action/respond/)
(http://www.tompaine.com/print/leave_no_cartoon_behind.php) (http://www.tompaine.com/action/sendtofriend/)
In late January, the new education secretary made _headlines_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40188-2005Jan26.html) for criticizing a
children's program on PBS which features an animated rabbit visiting a real
family headed by lesbian parents. The Campaign for America's Future's Earl Hadley
wonders where Secretary Spellings' priorities are. Working families around
the country are struggling to pay for college. Two days before Christmas, the
administration announced that it would enforce a change in the Pell grant
funding formula that will eliminate Pell Grants for nearly 100,000 students and
cut the aid for more than one million students. How about focusing on that?
Earl Hadley is the education program coordinator at the _Campaign For
America's Future_ (http://www.ourfuture.org/) .
What's today's word, class? Priorities. The new secretary of education's
first act after taking office was to condemn a cartoon. Let's not worry about
the achievement gap. Let's not worry about rising tuition. Let's not even
worry about investigating the Education Department for paying commentators to
promote its policies… No, in her first act, Secretary Spellings decided to take
on Buster the Bunny—an animated character who happens to make friends with a
little girl named Emma whose parents are lesbians.
PBS developed a series—Postcards From Buster —in which Buster travels to
different communities around the country to highlight cultural diversity. In a
letter to PBS, Spellings sharply criticized Buster's visit to a gay
household in Vermont—saying that "many parents would not want their young children
exposed to the life-styles portrayed in this episode."
Instead of protecting America's children from the "gay agenda," Spellings
should have used her time to support legislation protecting 89,000 college
students at risk of losing their Pell Grants—thanks to an eligibility change
instituted by her predecessor. Pell Grants help low- and middle-income families
send their children to college. She should have spent her time convincing the
president to significantly increase the maximum Pell Grant next year—higher
than the $100 he's proposing.
In the future—instead of writing letters—Spellings needs to use her
influence to make sure that President Bush actually raises the maximum Pell Grant.
In 2000, Bush—who calls himself the 'education' president—campaigned on
increasing the maximum Pell Grant to $5,100. But his last budget left the maximum
grant at $4,050. There's no reason to believe Bush is being sincere now,
particularly when he and conservatives in Congress over the past few years have
ignored bills proposing to raise the maximum Pell Grant. The president's
recent proposed increase was a response to the outrage around students losing
their Pell Grants. It's up to progressives to keep Bush's feet to the fire, if
families are going to see this increase.
Instead of serving as a foot soldier for conservative censorship, Spellings
needs to pay attention to the concerns of the majority of Americans—families
and students struggling to pay for college. Below are a few examples of why
the education secretary needs to put students and their families first
Donna Martinez
"The world is dangerous not because of those who do harm, but because of
those who look at it without doing anything." - Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/aaace-nla/attachments/20050130/baa3864b/attachment.htm
More information about the AAACE-NLA
mailing list