[AAACE-NLA] adult literacy & the U.S. political tradition

[ttweeton@comcast.net]

 "That hermeneutical work, if you will, requires a profound grappling with the key symbols, documents, and values stemming from the entire period (18776-1791) in ways that travel both with the grain of the nation's Founders as well as pushes the boundaries of the means of visualization and application beyond what they realized, but which has been realized (clearly in part) at various aspects and key moments in the nation's history."

"Pushing the boundaries" George, is not what  the Supreme Court Justices are about to do in my opinion, and as I have said,  nor are they there for that reason.
It is not for me to decide that this is right or wrong and it wouldn't much matter any way.   And George W. is about to place  "strict constructionists" in any  of the positions that come available in the future on the Court .There may be possibly 3 of those in the next few years. So I guess y'all...get ready for more of the same!

 Our time would be better spent  I believe, deciding how to get more of the Adult  funding, than to debate much about the whether Supreme Court Justices  are doing us a disservice at this point. Unless we can change this , I see this as a futile argument . There are  attorneys  who take care of what they find objectionable and deal with them directly on those issues.Unless something changes here,  I don't see that we have this  kind of power. Am I wrong?
 
Tanya Tweeton
ESOL and GED Programs
Fort lauderdale,Florida

-------------- Original message -------------- 

Hi Tayna,

I realize I'm pressing the envelope here. The basic argument is the need to ground public and policy support of adult literacy education within a convincing set of values that go to the core of the political culture, wherein the power/knowledge nexus most fully resides.  For the United States, any substantial reconstruction of the politics of literacy (and reconstruction is what is required, I am arguing) requires a firm linkage with the democratic, constitutional and republican value system reflected initially in the ethos coming out of the American Revolution.  That hermeneutical work, if you will, requires a profound grappling with the key symbols, documents, and values stemming from the entire period (18776-1791) in ways that travel both with the grain of the nation's Founders as well as pushes the boundaries of the means of visualization and application beyond what they realized, but which has been realized (clearly in part) at various aspects and key moments in the nation's history.

The metaphor of literacy itself and its various significations is part of this essential work of reconstruction.  

Let us be clear, this is a longer-term outlook, but a journey that can begin, at least in part in the present.  Thinking and acting out of its premises, and justifying the field's legitimacy based on its value system is important work in such a process.

Otherwise, what?

George Demetrion

----- Original Message -----
From: ttweeton at comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 10:14 PM
To: National Literacy Advocacy List sponsored by AAACE
Subject: Re: [AAACE-NLA] adult literacy & the U.S.political tradition

George, I understand  and "hear you" that you do not agree with the Supreme Court decision, however it is what it is. Perhaps some day, as in all things, the penduleum will swing the other way  with other Justices, and there may be a different interpretation of the Constitution in some other case, but for the moment..........

  You said " The issue is not so 
much whether literacy among the adult population is a right or a privilege.  
The issue is the role of adult basic education in providing the population 
with the basic tools and knowledge to participate in and contribute to the 
very blessings of liberty to which the Constitution aspires."

I too agree  of course that  adults should be educated. We discuss endlessly here  the good  reasons to do so. But that decision that you take issue with, I can see,  has,  most probably, repercussions with funding  of Adult Education. So if anyone questions why there is such a lack, perhaps that case is part of the background for the  reason. Maybe a big part. It seems clearer to me at least, now, why funding Adult Education  is not  seen as such a priority........ right or wrong. 
Tanya Tweeton
ESOL and GED
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/aaace-nla/attachments/20041208/51cf7a05/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "George demetrion" <gdemetrion at msn.com>
Subject: Re: [AAACE-NLA] adult literacy & the U.S. political tradition
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:40:19 +0000
Size: 851
Url: http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/aaace-nla/attachments/20041208/51cf7a05/attachment.eml