[AAACE-NLA] Critical Elements of Quality Programs
AWilder106@aol.com
AWilder106 at aol.com
Thu Jul 22 19:03:24 EDT 2004
I hope this is not one of those times when I should sleep on my remarks.
Usually we think of literacy as a "solution" to economic problems, not a
complete solution, but one way out. Recent research pushes that back, to ask:
What makes school achievement possible? Some of the answers to this question
are: medical care, vision care, dental care, nutrition--enough food to eat of
the proper kinds. We know we need these things, at a minimum, for kids to
succeed in school, to graduate. (Andres's programs make some inroads here.)
Now we move to Tom Sticht's concern, breaking the cycle of poverty, except he
has better phrases. We assume that somehow newly literate parents pass on
to their children their literate habits. That literacy can be passed on
within the family has been well-researched. However, there is a time lag,
unless the parent is exceptionally diligent, the time lag will probably affect the
other elements that children need to succeed in school--a poor parent, newly
literate, cannot supply suddenly for their children all that we know is needed
for better school performance.
So we should short circuit the process, and build into adult literacy
programs as many of the elements we know are needed for children's success in school
as we can. I think some programs must already be doing this. (Yes, there
is probably overlap between Head Start and Evenstart, I haven't researched this
fully.)
I want to make another remark concerning need. A couple of weeks ago, I
was able by chance to triangulate data on a high school in Mississippi and I
reported it here: 1) a first person account of two years teaching in the
school, 2) a Johns Hopkins study which identified that school among
others as a low performing high school, 3) a plea from an adult literacy
administrator(aaace-nla) who wanted to start up a program in the town, she
needed money.
So we have a community which has generated low literate adults. It has a
low performing high school in a poor community. An almost closed loop (some kids
escaped). A map--a graphic--of the towns/regions where these low performing
high schools are located could be drawn--these are the areas where adult
literacy programs are most needed and least available. This is the sociology of
low literacy.
The slums of Chicago, Detroit, Boston and other northern cities are the
resting place for the black citizens of some of these blasted communities.
Midwestern cities have taken former white Appalachians, displaced over the last 100
years by absentee landlords and the mining industry.
Another remark: a Wall Street Journal article this week confirmed what
pundits have been talking about, the two tier job market of our very soft economic
recovery. This implies retraining, which means adult literacy. An
economic map is probably available which shows where the softest of the soft spots
are located. We can predict need.
What I am suggesting is a comprehensive plan for adult literacy, based on
available information and pieces of theory--studies--which when strung together
form an integrated picture of need now, and future need. With the right
people with the right skills this shouldn't be hard to do.
Legislators do not want to invent the wheel. My bet is that a group of
extremely well-informed people with the necessary charts, graphs, and
information about linkages--what makes for strong communties--would get a hearing and
support.
My unit of analysis is the community. Schools anchor communites.
Communities are built around industries and mutual economic interests. The relevant
research will be found within adult literacy, but also outside it.
Andrea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/aaace-nla/attachments/20040722/0d62b660/attachment.htm
More information about the AAACE-NLA
mailing list