[AAACE-NLA] "Lobbying'' as euphemism
Eileen Eckert
eileeneckert at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 7 08:29:37 EDT 2003
Hi George and Catherine,
As you noticed, George, I was pointing out a possible interpretation of the
"citizen" tag that you didn't intend when you added it. I think there are
very few people on this list, if any, who would really intend to restrict
freedom of speech to U.S. citizens. Intended or not, though, we have
hundreds, maybe thousands, of non-citizens in detention without charge or
recognition, and with no end in sight. Even before the current era of
valuing the illusion of security over the reality of civil liberties,
non-citizens were often wary of claiming the constitutional rights that are
theirs by virtue of simply being in the U.S. Having articulated my concern
and hearing your responses takes care of the issue of possible
misinterpretation.
To tie this in with the subject line, lots of people have pointed out the
discontinuity between rhetoric and results that is a hallmark of the Bush
administration. "Patriot Act" is a cover for subversion of civil liberties
and unpatriotic action by government, "flexibility"--a keyword of the
proposed changes to workplace rules--stands for loss of same because masses
of workers will lose the right to be paid overtime when they work overtime,
"local control" of schools really means unprecedented federal control, and
on and on. And "lobbying" is used to mean anything some zealot in the
administration doesn't want to see in a public discussion. Garry Trudeau in
Doonesbury called it "down the rabbit hole."
I'm glad you took my comment as you did; we need to stand together and
resist the current wave of euphemisms and the undemocratic, anti-humanistic
actions for which they stand!
Eileen
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
More information about the AAACE-NLA
mailing list